In a sad, stupid, and short-sighted move, the National Audubon Society has decided to suspend their contract with Ted Williams and remove him from his position of “Editor-at-Large” on the masthead. Ted has contributed articles to Audubon Magazine for over 33 years. The reason for Audubon’s actions? He wrote a column, not for Audubon, but for the Orlando Sentinel, in which he advocated the killing of feral cats instead of the use of trap-neuter-release. The column was originally followed by “Ted Williams is editor-at-large for Audubon magazine” but was subsequently labeled as expressing the views of Ted Williams and not those of the National Audubon Society. (It has also apparently been edited by the newspaper since it was originally published to make it more palatable for the crazy cat people.)
What is perhaps most shameful about the statement Audubon put on their Facebook page is how they tried to distance themselves from Ted Williams:
Ted Williams is a freelance writer who published a personal opinion piece in the Orlando Sentinel. We regret any misimpression that Mr. Williams was speaking for us in any way: He wasn’t. Audubon magazine today suspended its contract with Mr. Williams and will remove him as “Editor at Large” from the masthead pending further review.
Mr. Williams is not an Audubon employee. He is a freelance writer and a conservationist who has written for Audubon for 33 years. He writes for numerous publications.
When one of the leading organizations for bird conservation in the United States caves to the pressure of the crazy cat people that is just disgusting. Feral cats kill birds by the billions in the United States and the only real solution to the problem is removal and euthanasia, along with heavy fines for those caught dumping cats.
Ted Williams is one of the few reasons I read Audubon Magazine. I see very little reason to continue doing so if his writing no longer appears there.
Hat-tip to Rick Wright who pointed me to the Audubon statement.
This post has been edited to clarify Audubon’s actions towards Ted Williams.
Cats in England are considered outdoor pets. Have they lost all their birds???? It’s the humans who get a pet don’t take care of it and let it out alone in the wild who should go to prison. cruel——–
I don’t know that they should go to prison, but they sure as hell should be paying a significant fine.
I would like to say I love all animals. I watch the birds and have bird feeders out. I love to take pictures. I live in Louisiana.and we have wood pecked and other type birds that come to my feeders. They are so beautiful. The birds and squirrels eat at the same feeders. When I was little I would listen to the Bob whites and the whippoorwills. I am older and now they have gone
I’m not sure why. I miss the sounds they were a special part of my childhood.
Now about the problem of the feral cats. When have so many in the area we live in. They are every where. I love cats! I have had cats all my life. I have Neighbors that try to get as many as they can fixed. I use to be able to do that but now I’m older and on a fixed income. On tv they always so get your cats fixed. Do you know how much the charge to do that. Males 150 or more and female 200+. This is a big problem. I have to deside wither to eat or get my medicine
It is ridiculous and people dump cats off all the time.
Ok I’m through but need people to know . We need help if we are going to solve this problem.
In reply to Maegaret Maes, cats aren’t considered ‘outdoor’ pets per se, just pets. Sadly we have had massive declines in many bird populations, some as much as 80% in the last two decades. The main causes are habitat degradation and decline and increased predation by cats and dogs (the latter tending to destroy ground nests more than anything).
To comment more generally, the declines of course cannot be due to one cause alone for all species. They vary. For example, Song Thrush decline in urban gardens is mainly due to cat predation at the nest or of fledged young. The decline in Corn Buntings, a ‘grassland’ species is due to over-intensification of agriculture and subsequent crash of invertebrate populations.
If we go back to feral cats, other than bird predation we do have a problem with interbreeding with the Scottish Wild Cat which is leading to the extinction of the species. One route is to eradicate feral cat populations. However, this is not easy due to the secretive nature of the animals so shooting is not particularly successful. Poisoning is too random, indeed it is illegal in the UK for obvious reasons. The only real way to deal with the problem as with other similar species is by trapping. In most non-native species they are euthanised humanely. It has been voiced that there may be merit in castrating males and releasing them back into the wild allowing them to hold territory and keeping other males (that are fertile) out of the area. However, there are problems with this, not least the effect of castration on the ability (or wont) of the male cat to hold a territory. It also does not stop male Wildcats mating with female feral cats. Spaying a female is more complicated than castrating a male and the cost and effort is a hindrance.
The saying ‘Live and let live’ is a good one but in the cold light of reality, this can only apply to balanced ecosystems. When Man unnaturally introduces a ‘species’ such as feral cats he must have the responsibility to control and ensure the balance of that system. If it means eradication, so be it. However, he also has the responsibility to do so effectively and humanely.
I would suggest concerted live trapping with humane euthanasia as the best way to combat feral cat predation of wildlife. Prior to this, mandatory chipping for all owned/pets cats must be introduced. The latter will then prevent pet cats from being euthanised, the live cat being identified and returned back to its owner. All this should be backed up with a full-on education programme, explaining the damage cats do to bird and small mammal populations, the mechanics of eco-systems and the effects of non-native species have and why. Cat owners should be encouraged to take responsibility for their pet and its actions. Indeed, there may be some areas where cats have access to protected areas which contain protected species. I’m not sure what the US law is but in the UK, if a predatory feral animal is perceived to be a direct threat to livestock or wildlife, permission is given for dispatch of that animal. Prosecution of the owner (if traced) may follow.
By the way, I’m a cat person – I will always like them, but I’m also pragmatic. I have a responsibility to and consideration for the native species that call the outdoors their home. Tibbles needs to run around a bit but he also gets fed regularly so he doesn’t need to feast on the local wildlife. Cat owners need to be reminded of that.
Sorry, that was a bit long-winded.
@a polite Englishman…
Thank you for your thoughtful response. I would like to add though that feral cats are probably all that’s standing between us (U.S. and Great Britain) and the next sweep of the Black Death and other plagues. They’ve already found it in the U.S. Concerning your suggestion for mandatory I.D. chipping, I don’t think this will do anything but enable bureaucrats greater ease levying fines. The problem lies in the fact that if someone acquires a cat that “doesn’t work out” for some reason and they didn’t update the chip before dumping it, guess who gets the fine? That’s right…the good Samaritan who rescued the little fur-ball and found it a home. Also, cats occasionally go AWAL (away without leave). Should these owners be fined as well? I think we need to concentrate on real solutions that don’t involve more useless laws. Cheers!
To the polite English gentleman, I couldn’t agree with you more, thank you.
Oh geez… At least I can admit that I’m uncomfortable about cat killing due to emotional reasons (protectiveness of creatures that remind me of animal family members, possible maternal instinct?) and that it doesn’t actually mesh with the rest of my moral system in a logical way. I also have mixed feelings about it that may be partially location-based. What on earth are my fellow cat people talking about…? I’d feel less embarrassed if people were quoting studies, but nope…
On a side note, I completely support the idea of education and cat leash and indoor-only laws, though since many cats refuse to wear a collar (and can remove one) the latter seems difficult to enforce (putting my own thoughts on the matter aside, just risking killing house cats would get way too sticky and probably never get off the ground as an idea anyway). Can we at least all agree that letting cats outside unsupervised is dangerous for them as well as wildlife in most areas?
I think this would be a good place to start.
@BC You are incorrect. All humans are an invasive species to North America by the definition expressed here, including the so called “Native” Americans. All immigrated at some point. In addition, if you go back far enough, our native North America flora and fauna are immigrants as well. The question is when they arrived, not who spontaneously sprang from the earth on the continent. It appears that species have been coming to this continent for a very long time and displacing the last wave before them. Kind of Darwinian, don’t you think? Just look at the fossil record. I love birds. I love cats. I have advocated for the spaying and neutering of pets since before most of you were born – before Bob Barker’s personal endorsements, before PETA, way before ACA. I have always advocated for and owned strictly indoor cats. That said, it appears that the problem is feral cat over population, and this will take a concerted effort on everyone’s part using various means to solve. Outdoor cats do more than hunt birds. They also hunt and control rodent populations which spread terrible deadly diseases. Google “rodent epidemic” and see. It seems to me that the goal is balance. We NEED some outdoor cats. They do an immeasurable service for us in the absence of other larger predators. But we need to be able to keep them at a manageable level where bird populations are not detrimentally impacted. I am against poisoning anything. It’s just not controllable. Anything can eat the bait or the sick animals who ate the bait. There are better ways to euthanize an animal. As painful as it is to say, the answer lies somewhere in the middle. More trapping in problem areas, neutering of most, rehoming those that can live indoors (not all cats can) and then euthanizing enough to bring down the truly wild population where necessary. Can anyone suggest the optimum season to do this? We manage other animal populations. We should be able to control feral cats as well.
By outdoor cats, I mean any cats out and about hunting whether owned or feral.
When will gringos ever learn to spell the word “cojones” properly? It is NOT cAjones.
Cojones, not cajones! Spelling matters…
© 2013 10,000 Birds. All words, images, and opinions are the property of their respective authors unless stated otherwise.
I live in a small community along a riparian corridor and our property attracts many different kinds of birds, especially during migrations. We are swamped with feral/stray cats and the problem is way out of control. I love cats, birds and animals in general, so can’t be called a hater. (I have five indoor cats, all resues.) Cats do not belong in our ecosystem and are negatively impacting all kinds of native species. We are not talking sweet “Fluffy” here, as the majority of these cats were either born in the wild or have gone feral, as such they are NOT domesticated! I’ve contacted government officials and the local humane society but no one is doing anything about the issue. I’ve found homes for kittens and have trained my dog to chase cats off our property, that’s about all I can do, legally, but I may have to take matters into my own hands to protect MY birds, as enough is enough. I actually feel sorry for these felines, but I also feel sorry for the House Sparrows that I routinely destroy. It’s not their fault, it’s our fault, and we need to remedy the situation by the most humane means possible. End of comment.