My colleague leavesnbloom over at the Nature Blog Network posted a really useful and cogent look at Copyright and Plagiarism. I learned quite a bit from it. If you’ve got a blog that you want to protect from scrapers, aggregators, and outright content thieves, you’ll want to read this ASAP!
Recent Posts
Close encounters with the QuebrantahuesosBy David T
Birding Brochure English, Part 1: An IntroductionBy Kai Pflug
Bird Nerd Book Club: The Feather WarsBy Hannah Buschert
Kruger Park, South Africa – Profile for BirdersBy Kai Pflug
Interviews with 10,000 Birds Writers: Leslie KinrysBy Editor
Birds that were thought to have been extinctBy Kai Pflug
Demotivational Posters for Birds (XXIV)By Kai Pflug
Posting Calendar
| DAY | WRITER(S) | SERIES (w) |
|---|---|---|
| MON | Kai (w) | Birding Lodges |
| TUE | Donna (m) Susan (m) Hannah (m) Fitzroy (m) Grace (m) | Bird Guides |
| WED | Leslie (bw) Faraaz (bw) | Ask a Birder |
| THU | Paul (w) Cathy (bw) Kelly (m) | Birder’s Lists |
| FRI | David (w) Kendall (m) | Species Spotlight |
| SAT | Peter (bw) Luca (bw) | From the Archives |
| SUN | Clive (w) Sanjana (m) | Three Photos |
| w weekly, bw biweekly, m monthly | ||
| Any time: Dragan, Erika, Jason, John, Mark, Rolf, Sara; Location Profiles | ||
See here for info on the writers.
Newsletter
Signup and receive notice of new posts!
Thank you!
You have successfully joined our subscriber list.







I’m not sure how much of a problem this is. I mean the kind of sites that rip content in order to sell advertising are easy to spot (even if you have adblocker on your Firefox, which you should!) and regular readers would invariably go to the actual source rather than some money-making knock off. It’s like mirrors of Wikipedia content – the real deal still gets most of the page views.
@Duncan: if you knew anything about recent German politics, you would be very sure of where the problem is! 🙂 😉