You should go read Ted Floyd’s post on the ABA Blog right now. It is pretty darn good and the conversation in the comments is worth reading as well, if only because a new term, “Schroedinger’s Gull,” has been introduced into the birder’s lexicon.
Recent Posts
The Chemistry of Birds (24): Turning PinkBy Kai Pflug
Three Photos: Asian HoubaraBy Editor
Netherlands – Profile for BirdersBy Peter
Birding Port Meadow, OxfordBy Luca
Photogenic Birding in San Vito, Costa RicaBy Patrick O'Donnell
Farewell to ArmsBy David T
Hannah and Erik Go Birding: Rio Grande Valley Birding Festival 2025By Hannah Buschert
Posting Calendar
| DAY | WRITER(S) | SERIES (weekly) |
|---|---|---|
| MON | Kai (w) | Birding Lodges |
| TUE | Donna (m) Susan (m) Hannah (m) Fitzroy (m) Grace (m) | Bird Guides |
| WED | Leslie (bw) Faraaz (bw) | Ask a Birder |
| THU | Paul (w) Cathy (bw) | Birder’s Lists |
| FRI | David (w) | Species Spotlight |
| SAT | Peter (bw) Luca (bw) | From the Archives |
| SUN | Clive (w) Sanjana (m) | Three Photos |
| w weekly, bw biweekly, m monthly | ||
| Any time: Jason, Mark, John, Sara, Rolf, Dragan | ||
See here for info on the writers.
Newsletter
Signup and receive notice of new posts!
Thank you!
You have successfully joined our subscriber list.






I love “Schroedinger’s Gull.” I’d like to see the introduction of quantum mechanics to bird identification expanded to include my own theory, which is that birders assume that a bird’s physical structure is stable, and this is not true! That warbler you’re trying to identify, the one that might be a Blackburnian? And then you blink and look again and realize it’s definitely a Pine? It’s not you~! The bird changed itself!