You should go read Ted Floyd’s post on the ABA Blog right now. It is pretty darn good and the conversation in the comments is worth reading as well, if only because a new term, “Schroedinger’s Gull,” has been introduced into the birder’s lexicon.
You should go read Ted Floyd’s post on the ABA Blog right now. It is pretty darn good and the conversation in the comments is worth reading as well, if only because a new term, “Schroedinger’s Gull,” has been introduced into the birder’s lexicon.
Welcome to 10,000 Birds, the world’s favorite birding blog! Learn more about our site, Mike, Corey, or our awesome team of Beat Writers.
Be sure to browse our extensive galleries, species accounts, and book and product reviews. Feel free to contact us and don’t forget to subscribe!
I love “Schroedinger’s Gull.” I’d like to see the introduction of quantum mechanics to bird identification expanded to include my own theory, which is that birders assume that a bird’s physical structure is stable, and this is not true! That warbler you’re trying to identify, the one that might be a Blackburnian? And then you blink and look again and realize it’s definitely a Pine? It’s not you~! The bird changed itself!