In principle, field guides make bird identification easier. In reality, some of their distinctions require ideal light, infinite patience, or a more cooperative bird. The following ten fall into that category.
“Shows a slightly finer bill profile.”
“Marginally paler fringes to the tertials.”
“Typically a touch more contrast on the facial pattern.”
“Often fractionally shorter-tailed.”
“Tail corners fractionally more prominent in flight.”
“Underparts generally marginally cleaner.”
“Wing panel usually a shade less prominent.”
“Slightly crisper edging on the greater coverts.”
“Subtle difference in the intensity of the eye-ring.”
“Supercilium a trace broader.”
Good luck spotting these differences in the field …














A more hurried song… paler colouration on the wing panel only visible in flight… And my best example: not really a distinguishing feature
The Sharp-shinned Hawk/Lesser Yellowlegs can be distinguished from the Cooper’s Hawk/Greater Yellowlegs by size… If you see them standing next to each other!
Haha some words here that I need to look up!
I love this! So true. Even when parsing a field guide, these slightly, paler, touch, crisper, fractionally trace differences cannot be generally or usually discerned. Doing it in the field; just ask an empidonax flycatcher.
I have pondered and returned hours later trying to convince myself “there is a difference”! Warblers, raptors, gulls, the list seems endless!